Back to resources

Official IB Extended Essay criteria

Read the official IB Extended Essay criteria with markbands, grade descriptors, and notes. The optional AI grading prompt stays at the bottom for self-review.

Step 1 — what are you working on?

Official criteria

General · All · Extended Essay

5 criteriaTotal 30 marksGrade descriptors included

Criterion A: Framework for the essay

6 marks

Guiding question

Do the research question, research methods and structural conventions followed provide an effective framework for the essay?

Note

If the work does not reach a standard outlined by the performance level descriptors, 0 marks are awarded for this criterion.

Research question

  • 1–2

    A research question is stated but it lacks relevance to the topic of investigation, clarity or focus.

  • 3–4

    The research question is relevant to the topic of their investigation and clear but only partially focused in relation to the scope of the essay.

  • 5–6

    The research question is relevant to the topic of investigation, clear and focused in relation to the scope of the essay.

Research methods

  • 1–2

    Research methods are used, but these are mostly unsuitable for the research question.

  • 3–4

    Research methods that are mostly suitable for the research question are explained and applied with partial effectiveness.

  • 5–6

    Research methods that are suitable for the research question are explained and applied effectively.

Structure

  • 1–2

    Structural conventions are present in the essay but these do not support communication of the research.

  • 3–4

    Structural conventions used in the essay support some aspects of the communication of the research.

  • 5–6

    Structural conventions used in the essay effectively support communication of the research.

Criterion B: Knowledge and understanding

6 marks

Guiding question

Does the student demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the subject matter being used in their research?

Note

If the work does not reach a standard outlined by the performance level descriptors, 0 marks are awarded for this criterion.

Knowledge

  • 1–2

    Research materials are used to establish knowledge of the subject matter but these materials lack relevance.

  • 3–4

    Relevant research materials are used to establish some knowledge of the subject matter.

  • 5–6

    Comprehensive, relevant research materials are used to establish knowledge of the subject matter.

Understanding — Terminology

  • 1–2

    Terminology is used but it lacks accuracy or is very limited.

  • 3–4

    Some relevant terminology is used accurately to demonstrate understanding of the subject matter.

  • 5–6

    Relevant terminology is used accurately and consistently to demonstrate understanding of the subject matter.

Understanding — Concepts

  • 1–2

    Concepts are identified but these are not relevant or are explained superficially.

  • 3–4

    Some relevant concepts are explained and used with partial effectiveness to demonstrate understanding of the subject matter.

  • 5–6

    Relevant concepts are explained and used effectively to demonstrate understanding of the subject matter.

Criterion C: Analysis and line of argument

6 marks

Guiding question

Does the student analyse the information presented in the essay and produce a coherent line of argument?

Note

If the work does not reach a standard outlined by the performance level descriptors, 0 marks are awarded for this criterion.

Analysis

  • 1–2

    The essay is descriptive rather than analytical.

  • 3–4

    The essay includes analysis that is partially effective and produces some relevant findings.

  • 5–6

    Analysis in the essay is effective and consistently produces relevant findings.

Line of argument

  • 1–2

    A partial line of argument is present.

  • 3–4

    A partially consistent line of argument links the research question, research findings and conclusions.

  • 5–6

    A clear, sustained line of argument links the research question, research findings and conclusions.

Criterion D: Discussion and evaluation

8 marks

Guiding question

Does the student discuss the findings and evaluate the essay?

Note

If the work does not reach a standard outlined by the performance level descriptors, 0 marks are awarded for this criterion.

Discussion

  • 1–2

    The significance of the findings is described, but there is no reference to supporting evidence.

  • 3–4

    A partially balanced discussion of the significance of the findings is sometimes supported by appropriate evidence.

  • 5–6

    A balanced discussion of the significance of the findings is often supported by appropriate evidence.

  • 7–8

    A balanced discussion of the significance of the findings is fully supported by appropriate evidence.

Evaluation

  • 1–2

    A partial evaluation of the effectiveness of the essay is present, but strengths and limitations are not stated.

  • 3–4

    An evaluation of the effectiveness of the essay is present, with some strengths and limitations stated.

  • 5–6

    An evaluation of the effectiveness of the essay is present, with relevant strengths and limitations described.

  • 7–8

    An evaluation of the effectiveness of the essay is present, with relevant strengths and limitations explained.

Criterion E: Reflection

4 marks

Guiding question

Does the student evaluate the effect of the extended essay learning experience on them as a learner?

Note

If the work does not reach a standard outlined by the performance level descriptors, 0 marks are awarded for this criterion.

Evaluative

  • 1

    Reflection on the extended essay learning experience is descriptive.

  • 2

    Reflection on the extended essay learning experience is descriptive and includes some specific examples.

  • 3

    Reflection on the extended essay learning experience is partially evaluative and includes specific examples.

  • 4

    Reflection on the extended essay learning experience is consistently evaluative and includes specific examples.

Growth

  • 1

    Reflection on the student’s growth is limited to a description of the process and there is no evidence of transfer of learning.

  • 2

    Reflection sometimes shows evidence of the student’s growth and transfer of learning.

  • 3

    Reflection often shows evidence of the student’s growth and transfer of learning.

  • 4

    Reflection consistently shows evidence of the student’s growth and transfer of learning.

Grade descriptors

  • A
    • The student demonstrates effective research skills, resulting in a well-focused and appropriate research question that can be explored within the scope of the chosen topic.
    • There is effective engagement with relevant research areas, methods and sources.
    • There is excellent knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the relevant discipline.
    • There is effective application of source material and correct use of subject-specific terminology and/or concepts that further supports this.
    • Conclusions are consistent, relevant and proficiently analysed.
    • Arguments show sustained reason and are supported effectively by evidence.
    • Research is critically evaluated.
    • Coherence, consistency and effective use of structural conventions support readability to an excellent degree.
    • Reflection on the extended essay learning experience is consistently evaluative and includes specific examples.
    • Reflection shows consistent evidence of the student’s growth and transfer of learning.
  • B
    • The student demonstrates appropriate research skills, resulting in a research question that can be explored within the scope of the chosen topic.
    • There is reasonably effective engagement with relevant research areas, methods and sources.
    • There is good knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the relevant discipline.
    • There is a reasonably effective application of source material and reasonable use of subject-specific terminology and/or concepts.
    • Conclusions are consistent and accurately analysed.
    • Arguments show reason and are often supported by evidence.
    • Research at times shows critical evaluation.
    • Coherence, consistency and use of structural conventions support readability to a good degree.
    • Reflection on the extended essay learning experience is partially evaluative and includes specific examples.
    • Reflection often shows evidence of the student’s growth and transfer of learning.
  • C
    • The student demonstrates evidence of research undertaken, leading to a research question that is not necessarily expressed in a way that can be explored within the scope of the chosen topic.
    • There is partially effective engagement with mostly appropriate research areas, methods and sources. However, there are some discrepancies in those processes, although these do not interfere with the planning and approach.
    • There is some knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the discipline, and the knowledge is mostly relevant.
    • There is an attempted application of source material and appropriate terminology and/or concepts; an attempted synthesis of research results with partially relevant analysis.
    • Conclusions are partly supported by the evidence.
    • Arguments are descriptive rather than analytical.
    • There is a partially successful evaluation of the research.
    • The essay is not always coherent and consistent, and structural conventions are irregularly applied, but this does not significantly hinder readability.
    • Reflection on the extended essay learning experience is descriptive and includes some specific examples.
    • Reflection sometimes shows evidence of the student’s growth and transfer of learning.
  • D
    • The student demonstrates a lack of research, resulting in unsatisfactory focus and a research question that is not answerable within the scope of the chosen topic.
    • At times, there is engagement with appropriate research, methods and sources, but discrepancies in those processes occasionally interfere with the planning and approach.
    • There is some relevant knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the discipline but at times the knowledge is irrelevant.
    • There is an attempted application of source material but with inaccuracies in the use of, or underuse of, terminology and/or concepts.
    • There is irrelevant analysis and inconsistent conclusions as a result of a descriptive discussion.
    • There is a lack of evaluation.
    • The limited coherence and consistency of the essay and absence of structural conventions hinders readability.
    • Reflection on the extended essay learning experience is descriptive.
    • Reflection on the student’s growth is limited to a description of the process and there is no evidence of transfer of learning.
  • E

    a failing condition

    • The student demonstrates little or no research, a lack of focus and an ineffective research question.
    • There is a generally unsystematic approach and a resulting unfocused research question.
    • There is limited engagement with limited research and sources.
    • There is generally limited and only partially accurate knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the discipline.
    • There are ineffective connections in the application of source material, and inaccuracies in the terminology and/or concepts used.

Optional: AI grading prompt

For self-review only

A copyable prompt that embeds the criteria above and asks an AI to grade the work criterion by criterion. Use it as a draft sanity check — not a substitute for teacher or examiner feedback.

Common questions

Where do the criteria come from?

The criteria are stored locally in a structured database that mirrors the official IB descriptors. The page only displays them — descriptor wording is preserved as written, with no paraphrasing.

Why pick subject, level, and component?

The criteria differ by assessment type, subject, level, and component. The selectors at the top filter the database to the criteria set that applies to your specific submission.

What is the AI grading prompt at the bottom for?

It is an optional helper. The prompt embeds the same criteria you see above and asks an AI to evaluate the work criterion by criterion. Useful for a quick self-review before teacher feedback.

Is my work sent anywhere?

No. The page only loads criteria. If you choose to use the AI prompt, you copy it manually and paste it into the AI tool of your choice — nothing leaves this page.

More IB resources

Other tools that pair well with the official criteria.

View all resources