Read the official IB Political Thought Internal Assessment criteria with markbands, guiding questions, and notes. Use the selectors to switch subject, level, or component; the optional AI grading prompt stays at the bottom for self-review.
Back to resourcesStep 1 — what are you working on?
Step 2 — narrow it down
Political Thought · All · Political thought investigation
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
The political issue is implicitly identified. There is a limited explanation of why this issue was selected.
The political issue is identified. There is some explanation of why this issue was selected.
The political issue is clearly identified. There is a clear explanation of why this issue was selected.
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
There summary of the political issue and relevant material is superficial and lacks accuracy. No link to political theory is established.
There is a satisfactory summary of the political issue and relevant material. A link to political theory is established.
There is a clear, accurate summary of the political issue and relevant material. A clear and effective link to political theory is established.
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
The response contains little or no critical analysis, and consists mostly of generalizations and poorly substantiated assertions. There is little or no recognition of the importance of the material in the context of political theory.
The response includes some analysis but is primarily narrative/ descriptive in nature rather than analytical. There is limited recognition of the importance of the material in the context of political theory.
The response includes analysis and evaluation. There is some recognition of the importance of the material in the context of political theory.
The response includes well developed analysis and evaluation. It demonstrates clear recognition of the importance of the material in the context of political theory.
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
The response lacks clarity and coherence, with structural issues significantly impeding understanding. It demonstrates a limited understanding of the demands of the task.
The response is clear, coherent and effectively organized. It demonstrates a high level of awareness of the demands of the task.
For self-review only
A copyable prompt that embeds the criteria above and asks an AI to grade the work criterion by criterion. Use it as a draft sanity check — not a substitute for teacher or examiner feedback.
The criteria are stored locally in a structured database that mirrors the official IB descriptors. The page only displays them — descriptor wording is preserved as written, with no paraphrasing.
The criteria differ by assessment type, subject, level, and component. The selectors at the top filter the database to the criteria set that applies to your specific submission.
It is an optional helper. The prompt embeds the same criteria you see above and asks an AI to evaluate the work criterion by criterion. Useful for a quick self-review before teacher feedback.
No. The page only loads criteria. If you choose to use the AI prompt, you copy it manually and paste it into the AI tool of your choice — nothing leaves this page.
Other tools that pair well with the official criteria.