TOK essay
10 marksGuiding question
Does the student provide a clear, coherent and critical exploration of the essay title?
- 9-10
Excellent
The discussion has a sustained focus on the title and is linked effectively to areas of knowledge. Arguments are clear, coherent and effectively supported by specific examples. The implications of arguments are considered. There is clear awareness and evaluation of different points of view.
Possible characteristics: Insightful, Convincing, Accomplished, Lucid
- 7-8
Good
The discussion is focused on the title and is linked effectively to areas of knowledge. Arguments are clear, coherent and supported by examples. There is awareness and some evaluation of different points of view.
Possible characteristics: Pertinent, Relevant, Analytical, Organized
- 5-6
Satisfactory
The discussion is focused on the title and is developed with some links to areas of knowledge. Arguments are offered and are supported by examples. There is some awareness of different points of view.
Possible characteristics: Acceptable, Mainstream, Adequate, Competent
- 3-4
Basic
The discussion is connected to the title and makes superficial or limited links to areas of knowledge. The discussion is largely descriptive. Limited arguments are offered but they are unclear and are not supported by effective examples.
Possible characteristics: Underdeveloped, Basic, Superficial, Limited
- 1-2
Rudimentary
The discussion is weakly connected to the title. While there may be links to the areas of knowledge, any relevant points are descriptive or consist only of unsupported assertions.
Possible characteristics: Ineffective, Descriptive, Incoherent, Formless
- 0
0
The discussion does not reach the standard described by the other levels or is not a response to one of the prescribed titles for the correct examination session.