Back to resources

Official IB Film IA criteria

Read the official IB Film Internal Assessment criteria with markbands, guiding questions, and notes. Use the selectors to switch subject, level, or component; the optional AI grading prompt stays at the bottom for self-review.

Step 1 — what are you working on?

Step 2 — narrow it down

Group
Subject
Level

Official criteria

Film · All · Film portfolio

2 criteriaTotal 8 marks

Criterion A: Portfolio pages

4 marks

Guiding question

To what extent does the student evaluate how their research, creative explorations and production work, led by filmmaker intentions, have shaped their understanding of the chosen film production role?

  • 0

    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

  • 1

    Led by undefined, weak or inappropriate filmmaker intentions, the portfolio pages and supporting evidence provide a limited or incomplete outline of the student’s research, creative explorations and production work, or the student’s understanding of the specific film production role is inaccurate, irrelevant or unclear.

    Possible characteristics: Limited, Irrelevant, Simplistic, Superficial

  • 2

    Led by clearly defined and appropriately creative filmmaker intentions, the portfolio pages and supporting evidence provide a description of how the student’s research, creative explorations and production work contributed to a mostly relevant or appropriate understanding of the specific film production role.

    Possible characteristics: Adequate, Attempted, Underdeveloped, Uneven

  • 3

    Led by clearly defined and appropriately creative filmmaker intentions, the portfolio pages and supporting evidence provide a detailed and informative explanation of how the student’s research, creative explorations and production work contributed to an accurate and relevant understanding of the specific film production role. The work appropriately addresses how any non-original materials have been creatively adapted, as necessary.

    Possible characteristics: Good, Accurate, Focused, Relevant

  • 4

    Led by clearly defined and appropriately creative filmmaker intentions, the portfolio pages and supporting evidence provide a compelling and discerning evaluation of how the student’s research, creative explorations and production work contributed to a highly appropriate understanding of the specific film production role. The work appropriately addresses how any non-original materials have been creatively adapted, as necessary.

    Possible characteristics: Excellent, Discerning, Insightful, Thorough

Criterion B: Film reel

4 marks

Guiding question

To what extent does the student demonstrate skills in the chosen film production role?

  • 0

    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

  • 1

    The film or collection of film clips demonstrate(s) a limited level of ability in the student’s production skills, as appropriate to the one film production role. The student’s use of skills, techniques and/or approaches are rudimentary and the results are ineffective.

    Possible characteristics: Limited, Irrelevant, Simplistic, Superficial

  • 2

    The film or collection of film clips demonstrate(s) an acceptable level of ability in the student’s production skills, as appropriate to the one film production role. Some relevant skills, techniques and/or approaches are applied, but these are underdeveloped.

    Possible characteristics: Adequate, Attempted, Underdeveloped, Uneven

  • 3

    The film or collection of film clips demonstrate(s) a competent level of proficiency in the student’s production skills, as appropriate to the one film production role. Relevant skills, techniques and/or approaches are applied in a clear and suitable manner.

    Possible characteristics: Good, Accurate, Focused, Relevant

  • 4

    The film or collection of film clips demonstrate(s) a sophisticated level of proficiency in the student’s production skills, as appropriate to the one film production role. Relevant skills, techniques and/or approaches are applied in a highly effective manner.

    Possible characteristics: Excellent, Discerning, Insightful, Thorough

Optional: AI grading prompt

For self-review only

A copyable prompt that embeds the criteria above and asks an AI to grade the work criterion by criterion. Use it as a draft sanity check — not a substitute for teacher or examiner feedback.

Common questions

Where do the criteria come from?

The criteria are stored locally in a structured database that mirrors the official IB descriptors. The page only displays them — descriptor wording is preserved as written, with no paraphrasing.

Why pick subject, level, and component?

The criteria differ by assessment type, subject, level, and component. The selectors at the top filter the database to the criteria set that applies to your specific submission.

What is the AI grading prompt at the bottom for?

It is an optional helper. The prompt embeds the same criteria you see above and asks an AI to evaluate the work criterion by criterion. Useful for a quick self-review before teacher feedback.

Is my work sent anywhere?

No. The page only loads criteria. If you choose to use the AI prompt, you copy it manually and paste it into the AI tool of your choice — nothing leaves this page.

More IB resources

Other tools that pair well with the official criteria.

View all resources